2buyshoes.com

" href="http://www.2buyshoes.com/new-zealand-prisoners-do-nothing-says-national-party/" rel="bookmark">
New Zealand prisoners do nothing says National party

Sunday, November 5, 2006

Figures released by Simon Power, law and order spokesman for the National party, show that the New Zealand Labour led government lets 81% of all prisoners not do any work while in prison. Newspaper, Sunday News says that some Christchurch prisoners have been given a barbecue for good behavior.

Simon Power’s figures show that of the 7,612 prisoners only 19% (1,470) of them took part in Corrections Inmate Employment during 2006. But in 2005 it was at 23% and in 2004 it was at 26%. He says that the prisons with the least amount of inmates working are: Rolleston with 8.6%, Mount Eden with 8.7%, Rimutaka with 11%, Christchurch Women’s with 13.5% and Dunedin with 13.8%. Mr Power said: “These figures are an appalling indictment on this Government’s approach to prisoner rehabilitation and preparing them for release.”

“In May, Corrections Minister Damien O’Connor announced a strategy that he said would help in ‘significantly increasing the number of prisoners in work and training. But a week later this was shown to be nothing more than window dressing when the Budget increased funding for prisoner employment by a measly $336,000 – up 1%.”

“They have cut funding [on the Corrections Department] by 27% since 2001/02, from $46.5 million to $34 million.”

Mr Power blames the low work rate on the big prison construction budget of $490 million. “There would have been more than a miserable $336,000 extra to spend on effective rehabilitation and work schemes,” he said.

“[Mr O’Conner] seems happier to spend $11 million on landscaping four new prisons and allow prisoners to sit around playing Playstations and Xboxes on their flat-screen TVs than he is about helping them get better prepared for when they are released.”

“Prisoners should be doing meaningful work, training or study while they are in prisons, and I imagine the public would agree,” Mr Power added.

Mr Power, commenting on the barbecue, said: “These people are in prison because they were found to be in serious breach of the law. The victims of their crimes will be grossly offended by the idea that they are being rewarded for anything. This is the just the latest in a long line of incredibly bad decisions made by the Corrections Department over the past year and taxpayers have had enough.”

Bevan Hanlon, president for the Corrections Officers Association, said: “The Mobsters getting a BBQ was a “joke”. (Christchurch Prison) staff are reporting the smell of dope every day. Mobsters are threatening staff on a daily basis and there appears to be high cellphone use (mobile phones are banned in jail). So what happens? They are given a BBQ.”

The Most Important Things You Need To Know Before Choosing A Tax Preparation Or Financial Planning S

by

aeronergy.com.au

Tax season is here. This has never been a particularly good time of year for you. The burden of analyzing the tax code to maximize the advantage you can get from it you leave to the professionals. There is nevertheless the bother of going through your income, expenditure, and capital holdings, recording them, and getting someone to work do the actual filing.

Choosing a sound tax preparation professional is a challenge. If you have not yet found one that you can rely on from one year to the next, then you must go through the chore of selecting a tax and financial advisory firm for this years filing. Although a great many independent and group tax professionals exist, you must draw up a list of likely candidates, winnow that list down, and then pick the one you think most qualified and suitable to handle your tax preparations.

Indeed, that is the number one thing you should know before making your final decision: does the agency have what it takes, as far as knowledge, skill, ability, and experience, to minimize your tax liability? If you have an extensive range of investments, run a number of business operations, own properties in different states and countries, or have a web of complex and interconnecting financial interests the tax professional you work with cannot be a mere clerk or junior associate. Serious money is at stake and you cannot afford to pay more tax than is necessary because the person assigned to your account did not have the knowledge, insight, and sagacity to give you the right advice.

Presidents and congresses come and go; but the U.S. Tax code stays largely the same. In fact, despite the rhetoric of closing tax loop holes they continue to grow. Indeed, what most people know as “loop holes” are really savings and subsidies that are in a sense justified. You take a great many financial risks. Your organizational skill and talent has led to the creation of enormous amounts of wealth; the part of your wealth that will be taxable no matter what constitutes a significant amount of money. It is right that you are able to make deductions and so forth on other parts of your wealth.

YouTube Preview Image

The key is to find a tax professional who can help you do that in an effective and legal way. The latter bit of that formulation is quite important. In the end, you sign the tax form submitted. You are therefore liable for everything on it. You may go so far as to have the person working on your taxes fill in the figures and check the boxes. However, you must ensure the right thing is being done before you sign your name.

Accuracy is essential”it is paramount. One of the criteria for deciding whether the person youre thinking of hiring is right for the job is their length of service as a tax expert and professional certifications. The last thing you want is for your tax filing to result in an audit or in some other investigation by state or federal authorities.

Financial planning is also a service that must be taken seriously. Peoples situations and circumstances differ. You may be trying to figure out the best way to manage an inheritance, you may want to determine the smartest way to invest the personal proceeds of your business venture, or you may need to do traditional estate planning. Whatever the specific case, the general aim remains the same: to protect and grow your capital.

The top considerations for choosing a financial planner are quite similar to choosing a tax advisor. The one thing to know about your advisor is their expertise in working with people in your financial circumstances. It is important to work with a qualified expert and to have some assurance that the people servicing your account are qualified as well.

If you are a person of means and independent wealth, you most likely have a general counsel”a lawyer dedicated to overseeing your various legal and financial affairs and giving you advice on when and how to act on certain matters. It is always good to have someone close to you who you know and trust. However, your lawyer is not likely to have in-depth knowledge of financial accounting and investment. When it comes to the formulation and review of your financial plan, nothing should stand between you and the actual planner. They must have unfettered access to you; and you must allow them to bring all any team members they need to brief you on various options and explain to you how each one will impact your financial future.

There are different ways of finding out whether the financial advisor youre thinking of working with is fit enough in knowledge and competence to deal with the complexity of your finances. The best way of assessing the people who will be working on your accounts is to ask for and about their certifications. Credentials matter in this line of work. Anyone acting as a financial planner should have received proper training and been made to sit a certification exam.

You cannot afford to take risks. It is not enough to merely hope that the people you trust to advise you are not incompetent; you need proof that this is not so. It is right that you ask to see copies of the certification certificates of each person who comes in to advise you.

If you need tax and financial help, check out the account services at https://jtaxbusiness.com/, the #1 Jackson Hewitt Franchisee in the Hudson Valley NY area.

Dealing with money is never easy. Although you take the matter seriously, you cannot allow it to consume whole days of your life. You have other things to do. It is therefore important that when you do set aside time for tax preparation and financial planning you are working with people properly qualified to guide you. The time you spend with such people should be brief, or at the very least not overly long. You should be given advice that is clear, coherent, and logical. This can only come from people who know what they are doing. Visit us at Jtaxbusiness.com or call (845)863-1040

If you need tax and financial help, check out the

account services

at https://jtaxbusiness.com/, the #1 Jackson Hewitt Franchisee in the Hudson Valley NY area.

Article Source:

eArticlesOnline.com }

" href="http://www.2buyshoes.com/interview-with-us-political-activist-and-philosopher-noam-chomsky/" rel="bookmark">
Interview with US political activist and philosopher Noam Chomsky

Saturday, April 4, 2009

Noam Chomsky is a professor emeritus at Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Linguistics and Philosophy. At the age of 40 he was credited with revolutionizing the field of modern linguistics. He was one of the first opponents of the Vietnam War, and is a self described Libertarian Socialist. At age 80 he continues to write books; his latest book, Hegemony or Survival, was a bestseller in non-fiction. According to the Arts and Humanities Citation Index Professor Chomsky is the eighth most cited scholar of all time.

On March 13, Professor Chomsky sat down with Michael Dranove for an interview in his MIT office in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

((Michael Dranove)) I just wanted to know if you had any thoughts on recent NATO actions and the protests coming up at the 60th NATO conference, I know you’re speaking at the counter-conference.

Could be I give so many talks I can’t remember (laughs).

On the NATO conference, well I mean the obvious question is why should NATO exist? In fact you can ask questions about why it should ever have existed, but now why should it exist. I mean the theory was, whether you believe it or not, that it would be a defensive alliance against potential Soviet aggression, that’s the basic doctrine. Well there’s no defense against Soviet aggression, so whether you believe that doctrine or not that’s gone.

When the Soviet Union collapsed there had been an agreement, a recent agreement, between Gorbachev and the U.S government and the first Bush administration. The agreement was that Gorbachev agreed to a quite remarkable concession: he agreed to let a united Germany join the NATO military alliance. Now it is remarkable in the light of history, the history of the past century, Germany alone had virtually destroyed Russia, twice, and Germany backed by a hostile military alliance, centered in the most phenomenal military power in history, that’s a real threat. Nevertheless he agreed, but there was a quid pro quo, namely that NATO should not expand to the east, so Russia would at least have a kind of security zone. And George Bush and James Baker, secretary of state, agreed that NATO would not expand one inch to the east. Gorbachev also proposed a nuclear free weapons zone in the region, but the U.S wouldn’t consider that.

Okay, so that was the basis on which then shortly after the Soviet Union collapsed. Well, Clinton came into office what did he do? Well one of the first things he did was to back down on the promise of not expanding NATO to the east. Well that’s a significant threat to the Soviet Union, to Russia now that there was no longer any Soviet Union, it was a significant threat to Russia and not surprisingly they responded by beefing up their offensive capacity, not much but some. So they rescinded their pledge not to use nuclear weapons on first strike, NATO had never rescinded it, but they had and started some remilitarization. With Bush, the aggressive militarism of the Bush administration, as predicted, induced Russia to extend further its offensive military capacity; it’s still going on right now. When Bush proposed the missile defense systems in Eastern Europe, Poland and Czechoslovakia, it was a real provocation to the Soviet Union. I mean that was discussed in U.S arms control journals, that they would have to regard as a potential threat to their strategic deterrent, meaning as a first strike weapon. And the claim was that it had to do with Iranian missiles, but forget about that.

Why should we even be debating NATO, is there any reason why it should exist?

Take say on Obama, Obama’s national security advisor James Jones former Marine commandant is on record of favoring expansion of NATO to the south and the east, further expansion of NATO, and also making it an intervention force. And the head of NATO, Hoop Scheffer, he has explained that NATO must take on responsibility for ensuring the security of pipelines and sea lanes, that is NATO must be a guarantor of energy supplies for the West. Well that’s kind of an unending war, so do we want NATO to exist, do we want there to be a Western military alliance that carries out these activities, with no pretense of defense? Well I think that’s a pretty good question; I don’t see why it should, I mean there happens to be no other military alliance remotely comparable — if there happened to be one I’d be opposed to that too. So I think the first question is, what is this all about, why should we even be debating NATO, is there any reason why it should exist?

((Michael Dranove)) We’ve seen mass strikes all around the world, in countries that we wouldn’t expect it. Do think this is a revival of the Left in the West? Or do you think it’s nothing?

It’s really hard to tell. I mean there’s certainly signs of it, and in the United States too, in fact we had a sit down strike in the United States not long ago, which is a very militant labor action. Sit down strikes which began at a significant level in the 1930’s were very threatening to management and ownership, because the sit down strike is one step before workers taking over the factory and running it and kicking out the management, and probably doing a better job. So that’s a frightening idea, and police were called in and so on. Well we just had one in the United States at the Republic Windows and Doors Factory, it’s hard to know, I mean these things are just hard to predict, they may take off, and they may take on a broader scope, they may fizzle away or be diverted.

((Michael Dranove)) Obama has said he’s going to halve the budget. Do you think it’s a little reminiscent of Clinton right before he decided to institute welfare reform, basically destroying half of welfare, do you think Obama is going to take the same course?

There’s nothing much in his budget to suggest otherwise, I mean for example, he didn’t really say much about it, about the welfare system, but he did indicate that they are going to have to reconsider Social Security. Well there’s nothing much about social security that needs reconsideration, it’s in pretty good financial shape, probably as good as it’s been in its history, it’s pretty well guaranteed for decades in advance. As long as any of the famous baby boomers are around social Security will be completely adequate. So its not for them, contrary to what’s being said. If there is a long term problem, which there probably is, there are minor adjustments that could take care of things.

So why bring up Social Security at all? If it’s an issue at all it’s a very minor one. I suspect the reason for bringing it up is, Social Security is regarded as a real threat by power centers, not because of what it does, very efficient low administrative costs, but for two reasons. One reason is that it helps the wrong people. It helps mostly poor people and disabled people and so on, so that’s kind of already wrong, even though it has a regressive tax. But I think a deeper reason is that social security is based on an idea that power centers find extremely disturbing, namely solidarity, concern for others, community, and so on.

If people have a commitment to solidarity, mutual aid, support, and so on, that’s dangerous because that could lead to concern for other things.

The fundamental idea of Social Security is that we care about whether the disabled widow across town has food to eat. And that kind of idea has to be driven out of people’s heads. If people have a commitment to solidarity, mutual aid, support, and so on, that’s dangerous because that could lead to concern for other things. Like, it’s well known, for example, that markets just don’t provide lots of options, which today are crucial options. So for example, markets today permit you to buy one brand of car or another. But a market doesn’t permit you to decide “I don’t want a car, I want a public transportation system”. That’s just not a choice made available on the market. And the same is true on a wide range of other issues of social significance, like whether to help the disabled widow across town. Okay, that’s what communities decide, that’s what democracy is about, that’s what social solidarity is about and mutual aid, and building institutions by people for the benefit of people. And that threatens the system of domination and control right at the heart, so there’s a constant attack on Social Security even though the pretexts aren’t worth paying attention to.

There are other questions on the budget; the budget is called redistributive, I mean, very marginally it is so, but the way it is redistributive to the extent that it is, is by slightly increasing the tax responsibility to the extremely wealthy. Top couple of percent, and the increase is very marginal, doesn’t get anywhere near where it was during the periods of high growth rate and so on. So that’s slightly redistributive, but there are other ways to be redistributive, which are more effective, for example allowing workers to unionize. It’s well known that where workers are allowed to unionize and most of them want to, that does lead to wages, better working conditions, benefits and so on, which is redistributive and also helps turn working people into more of a political force. And instead of being atomized and separated they’re working to together in principle, not that humans function so wonderfully, but at least it’s a move in that direction. And there is a potential legislation on the table that would help unionize, the Employee Free Choice Act. Which Obama has said he’s in favor of, but there’s nothing about it in the budget, in fact there’s nothing in the budget at all as far as I can tell about improving opportunities to unionize, which is an effective redistributive goal.

And there’s a debate right now, it happens to be in this morning’s paper if Obama’s being accused by Democrats, in fact particularly by Democrats, of taking on too much. Well actually he hasn’t taken on very much, the stimulus package; I mean anybody would have tried to work that out with a little variation. And the same with the bailouts which you can like or not, but any President is going to do it. What is claimed is that he’s adding on to it health care reform, which will be very expensive, another hundreds of billions of dollars, and it’s just not the time to do that. I mean, why would health care reform be more expensive? Well it depends which options you pick. If the healthcare reforms maintain the privatized system, yeah, it’s going to be very expensive because it’s a hopelessly inefficient system, it’s very costly, its administrative costs are far greater than Medicare, the government run system. So what that means is that he’s going to maintain a system which we know is inefficient, has poor outcomes, but is a great benefit to insurance companies, financial institutions, the pharmaceutical industry and so on. So it can save money, health care reform can be a method of deficit reduction. Namely by moving to an efficient system that provides health care to everyone, but that’s hardly talked about, its advocates are on the margins and its main advocates aren’t even included in the groups that are discussing it.

And if you look through it case after case there are a lot of questions like that. I mean, take unionization again, this isn’t in the budget but take an example. Obama, a couple of weeks ago, wanted to make a gesture to show his solidarity with the labor movement, which workers, well that’s different (chuckles) with the workers not the labor movement. And he went to go visit an industrial plant in Illinois, the plant was owned by Caterpillar. There was some protest over that, by human rights groups, church groups, and others because of Caterpillar’s really brutal role in destroying what’s left of Palestine. These were real weapons of mass destruction, so there were protests but he went anyway. However, there was a much deeper issue which hasn’t even been raised, which is a comment on our deep ideological indoctrination. I mean Caterpillar was the first industrial organization to resort to scabs, strikebreakers, to break a major strike. This was in the 1980’s, Reagan had already opened the doors with the air controllers, but this is the first in the manufacturing industry to do it. That hadn’t been done in generations. In fact, it was illegal in every industrial country except apartheid South Africa. But that was Caterpillar’s achievement helping to destroy a union by calling in scabs, and if you call in scabs forget about strikes, in other words, or any other labor action. Well that’s the plant Obama went to visit. It’s possible he didn’t know, because the level of indoctrination in our society is so profound that most people wouldn’t even know that. Still I think that it’s instructive, if you’re interested in doing something redistributive, you don’t go to a plant that made labor history by breaking the principle that you can’t break strikes with scabs.

((Michael Dranove)) I live out in Georgia, and a lot of people there are ultra-right wing Ron Paul Libertarians. They’re extremely cynical. Is there any way for people on the left to reach out to them?

I think what you have to do is ask, what makes them Ron Paul Libertarians? I don’t happen to think that makes a lot of sense, but nevertheless underlying it are feelings that do make sense. I mean the feeling for example that the government is our enemy. It’s a very widespread feeling, in fact, that’s been induced by propaganda as well.

So pretty soon it will be April 15th, and the people in your neighborhood are going to have to send in their income taxes. The way they’re going to look at it, and the way they’ve been trained to look at it is that there is some alien force, like maybe from Mars, that is stealing our hard earned money from us and giving it to the government. Okay, well, that would be true in a totalitarian state, but if you had a democratic society you’d look at it the other way around You’d say “great, it’s April 15th, we’re all going to contribute to implement the plans that we jointly decided on for the benefit of all of us.” But that idea is even more frightening than Social Security. It means that we would have a functioning democracy, and no center of concentrated power is ever going to want that, for perfectly obvious reasons. So yes there are efforts, and pretty successful efforts to get people to fear the government as their enemy, not to regard it as the collective population acting in terms of common goals that we’ve decided on which would be what have to happen in a democracy. And is to an extent what does happen in functioning democracies, like Bolivia, the poorest country in South America. It’s kind of what’s happening there more or less. But that’s very remote from what’s happening here.

Well I think Ron Paul supporters can be appealed to on these grounds, they’re also against military intervention, and we can ask “okay, why?” Is it just for their own security, do they want to be richer or something? I doubt it, I think people are concerned because they think we destroyed Iraq and so on. So I think that there are lots of common grounds that can be explored, even if the outcomes, at the moment, look very different. They look different because they’re framed within fixed doctrines. But those doctrines are not graven in stone. They can be undermined.

" href="http://www.2buyshoes.com/republican-leaders-in-us-want-more-tax-relief-in-economic-stimulus/" rel="bookmark">
Republican leaders in US want more tax relief in economic stimulus

Monday, January 26, 2009

As the newly inaugurated Barack Obama administration continues to push for a US$825 billion stimulus package to aid the struggling United States economy, some Republican legislators say they will not vote for such a plan without the inclusion of more tax cuts and less “unnecessary” spending.

Arizona Senator John McCain, Obama’s general election opponent and a leading voice within the Republican Party, says he would not vote for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan as it currently stands. Appearing on Fox News Sunday yesterday, McCain echoed his campaign platform in saying, “We need to make tax cuts permanent, and we need to make a commitment that there’ll be no new taxes.”

McCain and other Republicans say they are unhappy with the bill introduced in the House of Representatives, which combines roughly $550 billion in domestic spending with $275 billion in tax cuts. McCain believes not enough Republican proposals have been integrated into the plan, which he fears will result in the plan becoming “just another spending project” rather than a job creator.

“Republicans have not been brought in, to the degree that we should be in, to these negotiations and discussions. So far, as far as I can tell, no Republican proposal has been incorporated,” McCain said. “We’re losing sight of what the stimulus is all about, and that is job creation.”

The Arizona senator is known for his bipartisan efforts in Washington, D.C., but he defined his role in the new Senate as the “loyal opposition”, which does not mean “that I or my party will be a rubber stamp” for Obama, he said.

In his first weekly address since being sworn in, President Obama explained the stimulus plan in further detail, calling it a plan to “immediately jumpstart job creation as well as long-term economic growth.” He outlined several of the bill’s priorities, including the creation or salvation of up to four million jobs, as well as sweeping investments in health care, education, energy and infrastructure.

Among these investments are a new electricity grid with more than 3,000 miles of transmission lines, the weatherization of 2.5 million homes, health insurance protection for more than 8 million Americans, a renovation of over 10,000 schools, a project to repair thousands of miles of roadways, and an expansion of broadband Internet access.

Obama also laid out the rationale behind the stimulus, saying that “unprecedented action” is necessary in order to prevent further economic distress. “Our economy could fall $1 trillion short of its full capacity, which translates into more than $12,000 in lost income for a family of four,” Obama said. “In short, if we do not act boldly and swiftly, a bad situation could become dramatically worse.”

The president addressed the skepticism surrounding the stimulus package, pledging to “root out waste, inefficiency, and unnecessary spending”, while holding the government accountable for its actions. “We won’t just throw money at our problems,” Obama said. “We’ll invest in what works.”

Still, Republicans such as House Minority Leader John Boehner are skeptical of the plan’s effectiveness in rebuilding the economy. “I think a lot of Republicans will vote no because it’s a lot of wasteful Washington spending”, he commented on Meet the Press, repeating McCain’s call for less federal spending and more tax cuts.

Examples of “wasteful” spending cited by Republicans include millions of coupons to aid in the digital television transition, $200 million for new sod on the National Mall, and $360 million to fight sexually transmitted diseases, which includes funding for contraceptives. House Republicans have claimed it will take 10 years before the economy feels the effect of a stimulus, and that the combined spending of the stimulus and the financial bailouts of last year will leave future generations with over $2 trillion of debt.

In response to the stimulus plan being pushed through Congress, Boehner and Republican Whip Eric Cantor presented Obama with an alternative stimulus plan on Friday, one that relies exclusively on income and business tax cuts. “Our plan offers fast-acting tax relief, not slow-moving and wasteful government spending,” Boehner said. The counterproposal includes an income tax reduction that would save families an estimated $3,200 a year.

Despite this opposition, the stimulus bill is expected to pass through Congress by mid-February, as the Republican minority does not have enough votes to stop its approval. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell expressed a general support of the plan at a White House meeting with Obama and other congressional leaders. “I do think we’ll be able to meet the president’s deadline of getting the package to him by mid-February,” McConnell said. The bill is expected to go before Congress for a vote on Monday, February 2.

Obama’s top economic adviser Lawrence Summers defended the stimulus plan while on Meet the Press. He said the bill was intended to balance the long-term initiatives mentioned above with the tax cuts desired by Republicans. He also said Obama was committed to spending three quarters of the stimulus money within 18 months.

Romanian VAT to remain at 19 percent

" href="http://www.2buyshoes.com/romanian-vat-to-remain-at-19-percent/" rel="bookmark">
Romanian VAT to remain at 19 percent
Author: 5LTck8

23 May

Monday, February 28, 2005

[[w:Bucharest, Romania|Bucharest, Romania]] — The Romanian Finance Minister Ionu? Popescu has responded to public fears of a rise in value added tax (VAT) by saying that Romania’s VAT will remain at 19% and will not increase. He rejected rumours that the value added tax, which is applied to most goods and services, will increase due to negotiations with the International Monetary Fund and a need to boost government revenue.

After introducing a low flat tax rate of 16% on January 1, 2005, which applies to both personal income and corporate profits, the government has had to fund the tax cuts through alternative means, including increases in other types of taxation, to avoid running a high budget deficit. For example, from April 1, the government will increase excises as well as a range of other taxes. Despite the increase, Romania continues to have one of the lowest fiscal burdens in Europe due to the new 16% flat tax rate.

Book Oyo Rooms Shimla This Vacation For A Trip To Paradise}

Book Oyo Rooms Shimla This Vacation For a Trip To Paradise

by

RRanjan

The snow covered mountains close to the thrilling beauty surrounding the forests and musical streams tucked away in the paradise in Shimla, Himachal Pradesh. It is an attractive getaway all through the year for people from all parts of the country. Places you can visit in Shimla are-

The Ridge

Green Valley

Scandal Point

Shimla Gen

Shailey Peak

Viceregal Lodge

Kalka Shimla Mountain Railway

Gaiety heritage Cultural Complex

Shimla Christ Church

A great trip turns sour when your hotel stay is not what you expected it to be. Imagine the chill of Shimla and no hot water provision by the hotel. To save yourself from more such bad dreams check in the Oyo Rooms that make sure the basic amenities are available to make you comfortable. Oyo network of branded rooms offer all the amenities you would want at the end of a tiring yet wonderful day. The amenities provided by Oyo Rooms in Shimla are

Complimentary Breakfast

Clean linen and bed spread

Sterilized washrooms, soap bars and dental kit

Hot water availability, gym and swimming pool

Room-safe, Mini-fridge and smoke detectors

Internet and Wi-Fi facility

T.V, A/C and telephone

Laundry-service and Room service

Elevator, Banquet hall and business meeting room

Restaurant, Wheelchair access, Parking-zone

Oyo Room location and rates in Shimla

Oyo Rooms in Shimla are available in Mall Road, The Ridge, Town Hall, Old Bus Stand, Jakhoo Road and Railway Station areas. You can get Oyo Rooms in Kachi Ghatri and Cart Road in the range of Rs.1799-1899 which is the starting range. Other hotels and prime spots located in several other locations are available in the bracket of Rs2499-6499 with most of the options in within Rs3000. The intrinsic essence of the town attracts city people to escape the fast life and rest in the lap of nature.

Booking Oyo Room

Oyo Rooms can be booked by visiting ixigo.com typing location and selecting dates. Various filters are available to help you make your right choice. You can search for your stay as per locality and proximity to tourist spots. In addition to this, you can also select the price band, star ratings of the hotel, freebies and amenities you definitely need. These rooms are further categories in budget rooms and premium rooms. You can view actual snapshots of the rooms, faculties provided by the hotel, read reviews, compare your options and narrow done to your destination. If you are travelling from abroad check the rates in your currency from the option available. Before you set out on your trip do check the map view location of the hotel to reach there with ease.

Oyo Rooms simplifies the way we plan our stay and book our hotels. It created a platform to join the hotels with its anticipated customers benefiting and assuring them with convenience, comfort and consistency.

Click here for more information

Book Oyo Rooms Shimla This Vacation For a Trip To Paradise

Article Source:

eArticlesOnline.com }

How the Army Corps of Engineers closed one New Orleans breach

" href="http://www.2buyshoes.com/how-the-army-corps-of-engineers-closed-one-new-orleans-breach/" rel="bookmark">
How the Army Corps of Engineers closed one New Orleans breach
Author: 5LTck8

23 May

Friday, September 9, 2005

New Orleans, Louisiana — After Category 4 storm Hurricane Katrina slammed into New Orleans, on the night before August 29, 2005, several flood control constructions failed. Much of the city flooded through the openings. One of these was the flood wall forming one side of the 17th Street Canal, near Lake Pontchartrain. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) is the primary agency for engineering support during such emergencies. A USACE team was assessing the situation in New Orleans on the 29th, water flow was stopped September 2nd, and the breach was closed on September 5th.

Contents

  • 1 Background
  • 2 August 27: Before the storm
  • 3 August 29: Day of the storm
  • 4 August 30: Flood
  • 5 August 31: Recovery begins
  • 6 September 1: Construction
  • 7 September 2: Water flow stopped
  • 8 September 3
  • 9 September 4: Almost done
  • 10 September 5: Breach closed
  • 11 September 6: Pumping and moving on
  • 12 See also
  • 13 Sources

News briefs:August 2, 2010

" href="http://www.2buyshoes.com/news-briefsaugust-2-2010/" rel="bookmark">
News briefs:August 2, 2010
Author: 5LTck8

23 May

Wikinews Audio Briefs Credits
Produced By
Turtlestack
Recorded By
Turtlestack
Written By
Turtlestack
Listen To This Brief

Problems? See our media guide.

Fire at New Zealand hospital destroys laundry

" href="http://www.2buyshoes.com/fire-at-new-zealand-hospital-destroys-laundry/" rel="bookmark">
Fire at New Zealand hospital destroys laundry
Author: 5LTck8

23 May

Wednesday, August 9, 2006

A fire on Tuesday night at Southland Hospital, Invercargill has destroyed a two-storey building which was used for laundry and cleaning by the cleaning company Alsco.

Junior doctors and interns were evacuated from the nearby hospital campus. A dangerous goods store nearby nearby was saved from the fire. The building was not close enough to the new main hospital building to cause any damage to it.

Morris Robertson, Fire Chief, said: “We managed to save a dangerous goods store near the fire but the laundry is a total loss.”

Fire crews arrived at the scene at 9.30 p.m. (NZST) and Morris Robertson said that the building was well ablaze when they arrived. The first was so severe that they had to call in other firefighters to help, including volunteers. In total there was eight fire engines and 35 firefighters.

The fire was under control by 11.30 p.m. but the fire crews stayed overnight, just in case.

The cause of the fire has not yet been determined.

Good Luck Charms And Their Meaning}

Submitted by: Jason Littleton

Did you know that good luck charms are used for centuries for different purposes? Yes, they have myriad uses. Some of them used it to bring prosperity, luck and fortune to the wearer, while some used it to ward off evil spirits and bad luck in their lives.

Whatever their reasons, they exist not only to bring good luck, ward off misfortune, but also as ornament to beautify our homes and ourselves.

What good luck charms?

It is also known as amulets or talismans to bring luck and good fortune to bearers. For centuries, different cultures have their own superstitious and traditions on how these items were used, ranging from protecting warriors during battle, to ward off bad fortune, to bring luck and as a magical magic to make someone love somebody.

Regardless of the truthfulness of these superstitions, some individuals used it to achieve something, while others utilized them as personal ornaments or decorative items for their homes. Some used it to bring luck to businesses, to ward off accidents, to boost academic achievements and to bring luck to their love life.

Different types of good luck charms found in jewelries:

1. Ladybugs It is believed to bring good luck to the bearer. More so, it is considered bad luck to kill a ladybug.

2. Rainbows It is considered lucky because some people believed that there is a pot of gold at the end of every rainbow.

3. Tigers According to Chinese astrology, tigers are consider lucky and protector against fire, evil and theft.

4. Rabbits Foot Some people claimed that rabbits feet bring protection and good luck to travelers.

5. Buddha According to Chinese people, Buddha can serve as a lucky amulet especially when you rub his belly.

6. Nautical star It is a good luck symbol that provides protection and guidance to sailors.

7. Dream catcher It is considered a good fortune for Native Americans because it can ward off bad images and catch negative images of our dreams.

8. Number seven It is considered the luckiest number by different cultures and religions, like Hinduism, Buddhism and Christianity.

9. Bamboo Many individuals believed that a bamboo brings good luck to your home, thus Feng Shui experts suggest to have a bamboo inside your house.

10. Lucky penny People believed that seeing a penny on the ground brings good luck and good fortune to those to possess it.

11. Falling star Some claimed that your wishes will be granted if you see a falling star.

12. Sharks Tooth Some people alleged that it has healing and protective powers to those who possess it. Many individuals wear them as necklaces or keep them anywhere in their house.

13. Garlic Aside from its popularity of vanquishing vampire during the Middle Ages and its capacity to heal some diseases, it is also considered a tool that brings good luck to those who have them in their possession.

14. Cross Aside from being a symbol of Christianity, it is said to ward of evil spirits and brings good luck to those who have it.

The above mentioned amulets are some of the myriad talismans found worldwide.

About the Author: Jason Littleton enjoys writing for Charms to Treasure which sells

charms

and

good luck charms

as well as a host of related products.

Source:

isnare.com

Permanent Link:

isnare.com/?aid=856525&ca=Arts+and+Crafts }